The Bayer vs X-Trans test is carried out with a “Markesteijn algorithm”. Some observations to the references you’ve provided: I have sufficient knowledge in sensor design and in the development of sensor based image processing pipelines, doing this for many years. Hence the request for images ("seeing is believing").īy no means I’m falling for any kind of marketing copy or whatever. I just can't get over my worry about raw conversion. And reviews of the Fuji bodies and lenses seem quite complimentary. I don't do any sports or wildlife, or anything else that would demand long focal lengths or top of the line autofocus. I'm also open to any suggestions and comments you might have, as I am a relatively novice photographer. wide angle lenses and other situations where the distortion/vignetting/additional pixels may be preferred. (A related question: in LR apparently one cannot remove the lens profile embedded in Fuji raw files, which is limiting for e.g. So: have there been any image quality comparisons done with these raw converters recently (say, the last 1-2 years)? I'm particularly interested in comparisons to other 24MP crop Bayer sensor cameras where foliage or other potentially artifact-inducing subjects are present. (Why drop thousands of dollars on a camera system and cheap out on post-processing?) I have little experience with these, though if I were certain using them would eliminate any difficulties with artifacts I could be convinced to purchase one. Other options I've looked at include Capture One and Iridient Developer (or using X-Transformer to convert the raw files to. None of the updates since then seem to have changed anything here, though I'm happy to be corrected on this point. in foliage and bricks) and the application generally did poorly with X-trans files. Some Google searching reveals that, at least circa 2016, Lightroom's demosaicing process produced wormy artifacts (e.g. This unique design seems hard to process, to the point where I'm not sure it's worth dropping a bunch of money on a camera system if the resulting raw files are inherently compromised. I'm considering purchasing an XT-3, however the one big holdup I have is the quality of the raw conversion software for X-trans files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |